Theological Reflections on Commending and Sending
In the Nanning Covenant signed in China in
2002, YWAM set the direction for some of the current leadership issues we are
facing today. Further reflecting on the
process of Commending New Ministries on how this will be done rests
in the inter-relationship between commending bodies (oplocs and/or Elders),
commended-sent ones*, and receiving communities. At the end of the day, the commending ministry needs
to be empowered to send; the commended ministry needs to have the authority of
being sent; and the domain of receiving a new ministry needs to honored and
respected. If we can
achieve this, YWAM will have moved into a missiological stance of win/win/win,
which has great potential to unlock new strategies to reach new Omega Zones.
Therefore, commending needs to be done in such a
manner that there is
·
Discernment on the Word of the Lord-Jerusalem
Council; Paul to Macedonia
·
Empowerment in an impartational
manner (laying on of hands) to the sent ones-Peter to Cornelius; Paul and
Barnabas sent out from Antioch; Paul, Barnabas, Silas, and Judas with Jerusalem
letter to Antioch and other Gentile Churches
·
Assurance of peace (shalom/harmony)
being the predominant theme of the process-Gentiles receiving the Jerusalem
Council’s letter Acts 15:33
·
Effective Communication of all
parties-Periodic apostles reconnecting with those who sent them
·
Recognition of the strategic value
of being received culturally, legally, linguistically, and locally- the shift
from Jews to Gentiles
·
Ongoing interconnected,
relationally-based and co-operative
partnerships to achieve kingdom growth- non-sectarian divisions in the
Body of Christ verses diversity within the Body of Christ.
Scriptural prototypes for this process can
be found in Jesus sending out the 12, the 70, and other New Testament apostolic
ventures. See Matt. 10; Luke 10; Great
Commission-Matt 28; Mark 16; Luke 21; John 20; Acts 1; Peter to Cornelius’
household; Paul on missionary journeys; emissaries from the Jerusalem Council
etc. From the Jerusalem Council in Acts
15, here are some major guideposts for best practices in the process of
commending and sending
§ At the Jerusalem Council the letter sent to the Gentile churches was
based on “it seems good to us and the Holy Spirit…” and those who received the
letter received it as such, not as a decision from on high. Therefore, there was a harmony in hearing
from God. Act 15:28
§ The sending process seemed to be governed by the Spirit’s presence
in peace (shalom-community well-being/harmony).
Acts 15:33
§ Not only the wisdom of the Jerusalem letter, but also the freedom
for the Gentile churches to govern themselves underlines the authority of the
process transmitted by both letter and godly emissaries. Acts 15:22
I would be an interesting integration of
this process with the Nanning Tripod message in respect to the
sending/commending process. Very clearly
we have hearing from God, godly relationship and the authority of Elders cooperating
here for not only growth, but also in recognition that the Holy Spirit can
govern.
*Both missionary and apostle are based on
Latin or Greek words that mean “sent-ones”
Comments